August 18

What Is The Truly Healthiest Diet?

Filed under Raw Vegan Video Blog by Frederic Patenaude

There always has, and possibly always will be, debate within even the health community itself regarding diet.

Person A says that the program that they created and wrote about in their book is infinitely better than Person B’s similar-yet-different program they wrote about in their book. The theories and ideas proposed vary immensely.

Even niches within the health food world you will find disagreements and passionate debates. The interesting thing is that each party is completely convinced that they are correct.

Check out this video featuring a short debate between several plant-based doctors, including Caldwell Esselstyn, John McDougall, and Joel Fuhrman. You’ll discover:

• Why all successful populations of peoples since the beginning of civilization have lived on starch-based diets.
• When it may be appropriate to consciously limit the amount of starch you eat.
• How including more raw fruits and vegetables into your diet really makes you healthier.
• What you can learn by traveling and seeing what people eat around the world and how this can relate to your own health.
• How eating from and avoiding certain food categories can ultimately lead to a simpler, and healthier diet and lifestyle.

Despite all the disagreements and what we could even call “bickering” amongst people in the health field, most people can agree on at least a few things. Being active on a regular basis, emotional poise, fresh fruits and vegetables and foods in their natural form are all good for you.

Whether or not you eat 100% raw vegan or 100% organic and GMO-free really isn’t the biggest determining factor in your health. The whole totality of you as a whole human being is what determines your overall health. Try stepping back from all the disagreements and work on finding your own truth!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
August 12

The Mono Fruit Myth

Filed under Picking & Preparing Fruit by Frederic Patenaude

There’s a myth spread in some raw food circles, that says it’s better to consume fruit one at a time, rather than mixing them together. Proponents of this idea think that each fruit is better digested when it’s consumed “mono style,” one at a time, and ideally one type of fruit per meal.

They will make giant meals containing only watermelon, or papayas, or mangoes, or bananas.

I’ve got nothing against this practice, but it’s false to say that it’s healthier to do it.

Ripe fruits of all kinds are easy to digest, and have an almost identical chemical nutritional composition, consisting of mostly carbohydrates, some fiber, and low levels of protein and fat (around 5% each by calories). Your body will have absolutely no problems digesting them together, when mixed in a fruit salad, for example.

Other people are afraid of consuming certain fruits, like melons, along with other fruits, like oranges, fearing that this combination will lead to fermentation and gas.

Many of these ideas come from Dr. Herbert Shelton, in his book “Food Combining Made Easy.” Shelton gave a lot of rules with no reasoning at all behind them.

Also, a lot of people have misinterpreted that book. Because Shelton said “eat melons on their own”, some people think they should never eat melons with other fruits (such as peaches), when in fact Shelton clearly stated you could do so.

Essentially, his rule was meant to avoid the common combination/abomination in those days of a big slice of watermelon after of rich meal of meat and pasta.

There is absolutely no problems combining ALL kinds of fruit together, including bananas with melons, oranges with figs, or any combination you fancy. If you find that a certain combination gives you problems, avoid it in the future.

Also, by combining certain fruits together, you can avoid the problems of consuming a great quantity of any one fruit.

For example, pineapple and oranges are very acidic, and can hurt the enamel if you eat too much of it. But combining them with other, less acidic fruits buffers this extra acidity.

Eating great quantities of grapes or melons can give people a stomachache. Again, by eating a combination of different fruits, you avoid the problems.

If you’re used to eating your fruit “mono style,” you may not understand the appeal of having a big fruit salad ready, but once you try it, you’ll be converted!

It tastes amazing. When you use high quality fruit, the flavors not only blend and become more intense after just a few hours of marinating. A great homemade fruit salad doesn’t taste anything like the low quality stuff that’s sold in restaurants and in convenience store.

In addition to making a giant fruit salad, you might also want to prepare some other fruit and store it in containers, having it pre-cut and ready to eat.

Ingredients for the Fruit Salad

Any fruit you fancy can be thrown in a fruit salad, but I don’t personally add bananas. That’s my personal preference, because I don’t like the texture of bananas after it marinates in a fruit salad. But if you enjoy this combination, there’s no reason to avoid it.

My favorite fruits to add to a fruit salad are:

- Pineapple, especially when ripe and extra-sweet
- Melons, including watermelon. I’ll generally use only one type of melon
- Berries, I always try to include some type of berries in the salad, often strawberries and raspberries
- Mangoes, they add extra sweetness and creaminess
- Citrus, a few oranges or tangerines are excellent.
- Apples, I’ll throw in an apple or two for crunch
- Grapes: As long as good grapes are in season, I use them in fruit salad, generally slicing them in half.
- Papayas — in cubes, they’re my favorite in fruit salads!


Apricots — Deseed and slice in quarters.
Bananas – Slice them, if you enjoy the taste in fruit salads.
Cantaloupe and other Melons — Deseed, peel, and cut in cubes.
Cherry — Remove seed, ideally using a cherry pitter. I love the Cherry-It cherry pitter by Progressive. Cut in half.
Figs — Add fresh figs to salads, sliced.
Grapes — Use seedless grapes and slice them in half, or more if they are really big.
Kiwi — Gold kiwis are best. Peel and slice.
Watermelon — Use seedless and cut them in cubes.
Nectarines and peaches— Use good quality ones. Slice the flesh.
Berries — Throw them whole. Slice strawberries.
Oranges and citrus fruits — Slice the orange quarters in half.
Papayas — You may use them slightly (but not too) hard. Peel and cube.
Pears — Use the bosc varieties. Other varities are too soft.
Pineapple — Use fruits that smell the fruitiest. Do not use the inner core.
Pomegranates — Add seeds to the salad.
Star Fruit — It may add a visual element to the salad, when sliced in “stars.”
Fresh Herbs — Fresh herbs like mint, cilantro, parsley,  etc. — all go great in a fruit salad!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
August 2

The Value of High Fat Foods

Filed under Raw Vegan Video Blog by Frederic Patenaude

Now when people hear the term, “high-fat” or “fatty”, they almost inherently associate that food with the word “fattening” as well. We hear all about good fats, bad fats, and even really bad fats, but most people are used to either fully embracing or completely eschewing fatty foods.

Low-fat foods and overall lower-fat diets do tend to allow people to live longer, healthier lives. But one thing that most people fail to recognize is that even though you may eat an overall low-fat diet, that doesn’t mean you can’t include fatty foods and get all the benefits from them.

Although I recommend avoiding oils and eating a low-fat diet in general, it doesn’t mean the total exclusion of high-fat foods such as avocados, nuts and seeds. I eat those foods on a regular basis and recommend including them in most people’s diet.

Check out this video by Dr. Joel Fuhrman, author of, “Eat to Live”, and you’ll discover:

• Why a one-size-fits-all diet approach doesn’t necessarily work for everybody
• How in some cases a diet too low in fat can actually cause health issues
• Why we should start considering our MICRO-nutrients (vitamins and minerals, enzymes, antioxidants) just as much as our MACRO-nutrients (carbs, fats, proteins)
• In what instances taking individual supplement pills may actually increase your risk of getting sick
• How different types of fat impact your health in radically different ways

My answer to the question of “how much fat?” is: it depends. For most people on a plant-based diet, especially if weight loss is a goal, lowering fat content to 15% is a good target. And just like Dr. Fuhrman mentioned, more fat may be appropriate for active people who need more calories. If you’re an endurance athlete, it will be difficult to get all the calories you need from a 10% fat diet.

In practical terms, for many people it will mean restricting total fat intake to about half an avocado a day plus one ounce of nuts. More active people can have several ounces of nuts, or an entire avocado.

For more information, check out the Raw Health Starter Kit by clicking on the ad below.

How to Live 100 Years: the Blue Zones Revealed!

An interesting book to read, now almost a classic, is called “The Blue Zones” which researched areas of the world that have an unusual concentration of centenarians (people reaching the age of 100).

I first became aware of this research when I was living in Costa Rica and a group of researchers came to the Nicoya Peninsula to discover that this area of the world was one of those coveted “Blue Zones” where there’s a very high percentage of centenarians compared to the United States.

What I really liked about the book was the fact that it was based on actual, verifiable research.

In the past, many people have claimed that certain cultures have lived a very long time, such as the Hunzas in Pakistan or the Vilcabamba residents in Ecuador. The problem is that the record keeping in those areas was very poor and there was no way to verify the ages of the alleged centenarians. Someone could claim to be 110 years old and in fact be only 90. In fact, this kind of exaggeration was very common.

With The Blue Zones, the researchers had new scientific techniques that could verify someone’s age, and using DNA data they could also trace back the ancestry of the people they met. Combined with verifiable birth certificates, they have located five areas of the world where people have managed to outlive Americans by often a decade or more.

A lot of people who are proponents of specific diets, such as the paleo diet, like to refer to some unproven, anecdotal advice on the “good health” of certain tribes, such as the Inuits. When in fact there are many other people who lived far longer and healthier than this example.

The Blue Zones is the first set of data that looks at populations that have an unusually high number of centenarians. Often these areas have been overtaken by fast food and the health of new generations is poor. But those people that managed to live 100 years or more are from a different era, and have kept the same lifestyle practices that they had in their youth.

These five Blue Zones are:

  • The island of Sardinia, in Italy
  • The tropical islands of Okinawa, in Japan
  • The Nicoya peninsula, in Costa Rica
  • The religious group of the 7th Day Adventists, living in Loma Linda, California

Those four groups are covered in the book. But last year the group of researchers also uncovered another Blue Zone, on the island of Ikaria in Greece, where nearly 1 out of every 3 people make it to their 90s (Which is very unusual).

Before I go into the characteristics of these people, I want to point out one important point for all those people out there on low-carb, paleo, meat-eating, “hunter-gatherer” diets (or whatever you want to call them).

All of the longest live people in the world — without exception — live on a high-carb, plant-based diet!

You will not find anywhere in the world a group of people — with documented evidence — living that long and that well on a high-fat, high protein, animal-based, low carb diet.

Also, the research done on the 7th Day Adventists debunks the myth that there are no long-lived populations on a vegan diet (more on that later).

What did these people eat?

==> In Sardinia, Italy, the traditional diet was based on whole wheat bread, vegetables, a little goat cheese and wine. Meat was not consumed on a daily basis.

From the book: “Shepherds and peasants in Sardinia have an exceptionally simple diet, which is extraordinarily lean even by mediterranean standards”, a 1941 survey reported. “Bread is by far the main food. Peasants leave early in the morning to the fields with a kilogram of bread in their saddlebag… At noon their meal consists only of bread, with some cheese among wealthier families, while the majority of the workers are satisfied with an onion, a little fennel, or a bunch of radishes. At dinner, the reunited family eats a single meal consisting of a vegetable soup (minestrone) to which the richest add some pasta. In most areas, families ate meat only once a week, on Sunday (…). Interestingly for a Mediterranean culture, fish did not figure prominently into the diet”

Also, the Sardinians consumed goat’s milk and not cow’s milk.

It doesn’t take much nutritional knowledge to see that the diet described above is plant-based and very low in fat, and high in carbohydrates.

===> On Okinawa, the diet was based on sweet potatoes, traditional soy products, rice and vegetables.

When a 102-year old woman (who apparently looks like she’s in her 70’s) describes her routine, she says:

“I wake up at about 6 a.m. and make a pot of jasmine tea and eat my breakfast, usually miso soup with vegetables. (…) At noon, Kamada said, she wanders into the kitchen garden behind her house to harvest some herbs and vegetables for her lunch. “I’ll use mugwork to give my rice flavor or tumeric to spice my soup, she said. “I don’t eat much any more. Usually just stir-fried vegetables and maybe some tofu.” And meat, I asked. “Oh yes, I like meat, but not always. When I was a girl, I ate it only during the New Year festivals. I’m not in the habit of eating it every day.”

She eats a very light dinner before 6 p.m. that might include some fish soup, whatever vegetables are in season, some spring onions, salad and rice. She’s usually in bed by 9 p.m.

When the researcher asks her daughter if she ever drank a Coke, we find out she never once did that in her life, and when she first saw a hamburger she had asked “What do you do with that?”

The typical diet of these Okinawan centenarian was again very simple: vegetables from the garden, green tea, and maybe a little fish, with some rice and tofu.

They also have the interesting habit of saying hara hachi bu, before each meal. It’s a Confucian adage that these elders say before they eat to remind them to eat until they are 80 percent full.

===> The 7th Day Adventists’s diet is more aligned with your typical health-food store enthusiast rather than a traditional diet forced by circumstances. Things like fresh fruit, oatmeal, salads and vegetarian foods are part of the menu. Interestingly enough, not all 7th Day Adventists are vegetarians or vegan. But the vegetarians lived longer than the meat eaters (on average two years longer), and the vegans lived even longer than the vegetarians.

“(…) Adventists who are what we call lacto-ovo vegetarians, meaning they eat eggs and other dairy products, still are an average of 16 pounds lighter than Adventists of the same height who are non-vegetarian. And Adventists who are strictly vegan, which is only 4 percent, are 30 to 32 pounds lighter than non-vegetarian Adventists of the same height. That has a huge impact on cardiovascular disease, on blood pressure, on blood cholesterol, on inflammation related to hormones and the way it stimulates cells in the body.”

For those who think there are no documented populations of vegans in the world who live a long life, they are wrong. The 7th Day Adventists prove exactly that.

===> The Nicoyans in Costa Rica ate mostly corn tortillas, beans, some animal protein such as eggs and some amount of pork or chicken. They ate more animal foods than other long-lived populations, but also ate the most fruit out of all long-lived populations.

From the book: “They asked centenarians what they ate and heard “beans, rice, tortillas and fruit” over and over. (…) A few characteristics of the Nicoya’s diet stood out. Like the people in most other Blue Zones, Nicoyans ate the emblematic low-calorie, low-fat, plant-based diet, rich in legumes. But unlike other Blue Zones, the Nicoyan diet featured portions of corn tortillas at almost every meal and huge quantities of tropical fruit. Sweet lemon, orange, and a banana variety are the most common fruits throughout most of the year in Nicoya.”

An interesting fact of the Nicoyan diet is that Nicoya have the lowest stomach cancer rate out of the country of Costa Rica. For some reason, Costa Ricans have one of the highest stomach cancer rates in the world. The conclusion by the researchers was that the high amount of fruit consumed in Nicoya helped prevent stomach cancer.

If you want the full story, you can read the book, but let me outline a few important points about diet that stood out for me.

  1. All long-lived people live on a high-carb, low-fat, plant-based diet
  2. All long-lived people eat a lot of vegetables, including greens.
  3. Whenever they can get it, long-lived populations eat a lot of fruit and it seems to contribute to their longevity
  4. When animal products are consumed, it’s occasionally and in small amounts only. But the 7th Day Adventist study also showed that vegans live longer than vegetarians or meat eaters, so the ideal is to avoid all animal products. If you do eat animal products, it shouldn’t be more than a few times a month (paleo eaters take note).
  5. All long-lived people had periods in their life when a lot less food was available and they had to survive on a very sparse, limited diet. For example, the centenarians in the book in Okinawa describe a time during World War II when they lived on sweet potatoes for three meals a day. When discussing the centenarians in Italy: “When their family was young, in the 1950s, they were very poor. They ate what they produced on their land — mostly bread, cheese and vegetables (zucchini, tomatoes, potatoes, eggplant, and most significantly, fava beans). Meat was at best a weekly affair, boiled on Sunday with pasta and roasted during the festivals.” This reinforces my concept of periodic fasting. Because we live in a society of such abundance, we have to force ourselves to go through periods of restrictions with periodic cleanses and fasting.
  6. All long-lived people live in a sunny, warm climate — but not necessarily tropical. They got plenty of vitamin D from natural sunshine. The warmer climate probably also contributes to less stress and a more relaxed lifestyle.
  7. All long-lived people consume beans in some form or another.
  8. Nuts appear to be good for health. The 7th Day Adventists who ate a small serving of nuts several times a week had about half the risk of heart disease of those who didn’t.
  9. The typical centenarian diet is very simple. If you analyze all these diets from long-lived people around the world, they essentially eat the same simple foods every day. It appears that you do not need a wide variety of foods in your diet to be healthy. Quality food over variety is more important. Also, rich foods like meat and cheese are reserved for special occasions, and eaten at the most a few times a month if at all.
  10. They did not constantly change their diet or jump on the latest superfood fad. They ate the same seasonal things every day of the year.

Other Considerations

Of course, diet is only part of the answer. Other important points outlined in the Blue Zones include:

  1. Exercise. The biggest insight in the book besides the diet points I have outlined is how much long-lived people exercise. It actually shocked me to realize that I’m not getting nearly as much exercise as I should.It seems that in the prime of their lives, these centenarians were probably getting something like 5 or 6 hours of moderate exercise per day (such as walking and working outdoors). And as they get older, they keep on walking and being active.Thus, the concept of exercising a few times a week to stay in shape seems seriously flawed. None of these centenarians “worked out”. They simply had an active lifestyle and walked a lot.An hour a day of walking or running, combined with weight training exercises and other outdoor activities you enjoy (golfing, swimming, etc.) should be the goal for anyone wanting to live a long and healthy life.
  2. An Active Life — Another stunning realization is that all of the long-lived people in the book loved to work. In fact, some of them could be considered to have been “workaholics” in the prime of their life, and many of them never actually “retired”. They maintained an active lifestyle throughout their life.This blows out the concept that working hard is bad for you, or that staying home doing nothing is the best way to relax, or that the goal in life should be to save enough to retire at age 55 or 60 and then enjoy the good life.
  3. A sense of purpose — All long-lived people had a strong sense of purpose. They had a reason to get up in the morning and do something. The Nicoyans called it “A plan de vida” which means a “life plan”. They were also engaged socially in their communities.
  4. Family — This is a tough one for many of us, but it seems pretty obvious that in order to live a long life you can’t go it alone. All centenarians had big families that they supported and who supported them until the end.
  5. Obvious things — Of course, the obvious factors are there as well. None of them smoked (no kidding) or ate massive quantities of food. However, from reading between the lines, I also understood that these centenarians progressively reduced the quantities of food they ate as they got older. One lady in Okinawa said ‘I don’t eat much anymore”.

Obviously, if you’re 35 you can’t follow the diet of a 102 year old lady. But as we get older, we must progressively reduce the amount of food we eat if we want to live a long life.

How Come There Are No Raw-Foodists on this list?

The big question everybody will ask is obviously this one: how come none of the long-lived people on the planet eat a raw-food diet?

You have to keep in mind that except for the 7th Day Adventists, none of these long-lived people actually consciously chose their diet and lifestyle. It was something that evolved naturally and that they did due to the environment of where they lived.

But the 7th Day Adventist study showed that when a group of people consciously decides to improve their diet as a whole, that they can significantly increase their lifespan and the quality of their lives.

The 7th Day Adventists did not have particularly good genes. They just were part of a religious group that had the particular feature of discouraging bad habits such as eating meat or drinking caffeine.

The 7th Day Adventists who ate a vegetarian diets lived longer than those who still ate meat, and those who were vegans lived even longer. Who knows what would have happened if some of them also ate a mostly-raw or all raw diet?

We actually don’t know what would happen if a population of people ate a raw food diet because it’s never been done and documented before.

However, based on the current studies done on long-lived people with the Blue Zones, we know that:

  • All long-lived people eat a high-carb, low fat diet
  • All long-lived people eat a plant-based diet
  • All long-lived people ate a lot of vegetables

So if you wanted to try a raw-food diet for longevity, it would have to at least meet those requirements.

Which means potentially the best diet in the world would be a diet of fruits and vegetables, with some nuts and seeds, where most of the calories come from fruit.

How many of you are ready to live 100 years or more?

Read the blue zones on Amazon Kindle or order the printed copy here

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
July 24

White potatoes are a food that seems to get picked on a lot in many health circles. Some will say they simply lack the color and phytonutrients of other starchy vegetables, while others insist they are nothing but a giant wad of starch who’s sole purpose is to make you fat and sick.

Of course, there are parts of the world like the mountains of Peru and parts of Europe where people eat a diet based on potatoes and other starchy vegetables, and have done so in good health for hundreds of years.

Some people have taken this idea to the extreme and adopted potato-only diets for extended periods of time. Check out this short presentation from Dr. John McDougall and you’ll discover:

• Why some people can actually lose weight and get healthier doing a “crazy” potato-only diet
• How the absence of unhealthy foods is the critical component behind getting healthier on these mono diets
• Understand why many plant foods are nutritionally complete by themselves
• Why all large populations of healthy people on the planet get most of their calories from plants and starch

Now I don’t recommend you go out and adopt an all-potato diet. You might do fine for a while, but to be truly healthy we need to eat a variety of plant foods.

And as long as you’re not frying or drowning your potatoes in butter and cheese it is perfectly fine to include potatoes in your diet, be it white, red, yellow, purple, or sweet. Also read my article on this topic.

The Recipe eBook special is back! 

You can get my six best recipe books along with my complete DVD series at the ridiculous price of $29.95 for everything.

Buying everything separately will cost you over $200. So this is a real deal.

This special ends by today.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
July 16

Caloric Density Explained

Filed under Raw Vegan Video Blog by Frederic Patenaude

Caloric density is something that I’ve discussed before, and one of the best tools you can use to either gain or lose weight at will. 

One of my favorite examples is to show the caloric density of certain gourmet raw food items and the caloric density of the foods they are trying to imitate. In most cases, the raw food has over twice the amount of calories and several times the amount of fat.

Of course there are other things to consider besides just fat and calories when it comes to food, but this does point out the significance of calorie density when it comes to our health and waistlines.

Check out this great clip of Jeff Novick explaining all about calorie density and you’ll learn:

• The difference between caloric density and caloric volume, and how this affects your health
• Why some foods are so easy to overeat on
• How the volume and total weight of the food you eat plays a role in feeling satisfied
• What causes a food to be more or less calorie dense
• How you can eat more and weight less

Learning about calorie density is an eye-opener for many people, especially when they understand why two plates of foods can look the same in volume but be dramatically different nutritionally.

That doesn’t mean you have to completely avoid calorie-dense foods. Nuts, seeds, avocados, and coconuts are all very concentrated foods, but they can still be included in smaller amounts in a healthy diet.

If you wish to lose weight:
Eat ONLY caloric dense foods.


Caloric Density Per Pound

Fresh raw or cooked veggies 100
Fresh raw fruit 250-300
Cooked Starchy Vegetables, Intact Whole Grains 450-500
Legumes and Beans 550-600
Meat Products 900-1000
Dried Fruit 1200
Processed grains and Flours (even if made from whole grains) 1200-1500
Cheese 1800
Nuts and Seeds 2800
Cheese 1800
Oil 4000


Keep in mind that this is an average across a category. For example, we know that bananas contain more calories per weight than apples, but overall fruits have a similar caloric density.

Looking at this table, you’d be tempted to only eat vegetables, as they contain only 100 calories per pound. It’s important to note that nobody can live on just vegetables, and that you’d get so hungry on a diet of just vegetables that you’d eventually break down and eat something else! However, you want your diet to contain plenty of raw vegetables by weight.

The concept of caloric density is to look at the overall caloric density of your meals.

If the caloric density of your food is below 400 calories per pound, you will lose weight no matter what you do!

If you wish to gain weight: increase the caloric density of your food by eating fewer water-rich foods and more concentrated, caloric-dense foods.


70% off on the Perfect Health Program. Use coupon code: PERFECT0716

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
July 15

French People Don’t Get Fat

Filed under Traveling in the Raw by Frederic Patenaude

You may have heard of the French Paradox.

This is mysterious statistical fact that although French people eat a diet rich in saturated fat, they have relatively low levels of cardiovascular disease, compared to Americans.

Is it the wine that’s protecting them?

Are fatty foods actually bad for us?

Before I get into that, I must first say that I’m not French, even though it is my first language. I’m French Canadian. Big difference in culture and food. However, I have been half a dozen times to France and have spent enough time there, along with French expats in Montreal, to have a good idea.

Why French People Stay Thin

It is true, French people are much slimmer than Americans overall, even in 2014.

And yes, they eat some of the most decadent, fatty foods known to mankind, and they do that on a regular basis.

I’m talking about butter in everything: sauces, croissants, meat… everything contains a ridiculous amount of fat, that would make any nutritionist cringe.

They have hundreds of types of cheese, and they love to talk about them too.

Wine is popular, although much less so, in recent years.

80% of French people eat baguette with every meal.

With all that fattening food, you’d expect the French to be at least fatter than Americans, but the contrary is quite true. Obesity rates are at around 10% here, compared to 33% in the US.

France is the 128th fattest country in the world.

And also rates of heart rate disease (by number of deaths every year) is almost a third of what it is in the US.

Cancer rates are also a little lower, but not dramatically so.

So…. qu’est-ce qu’il se passe!? (What is going on!?)

Some have said that the reason French people stay relatively healthier is that they drink so much wine, and wine somehow protects them and “cleans their arteries”.

However, further research disproved this theory.

What is clear now is that French people stay slimmer and have less heart disease because they eat less in general, and they care more about what they eat.

One of the main factors is QUANTITY.

In French, the word for lunch literally means “breakfast” because it was the first meal of the day.

However, when people started eating a little something in the morning, they called that meal “little breakfast” (petit déjeuner).

The average breakfast in France is still pretty light. Maybe a croissant with some coffee, but many people skip it entirely.

Lunch is a big thing. They take their lunches seriously, often taking 2 hours or more to eat and chat.

Dinner is traditionally simple, and many smart French people eat almost nothing for dinner — maybe some fruit and yogurt. However, it’s becoming popular to have bigger dinners nowadays.

Another important fact: French people rarely eat in between meals. You will rarely see people snacking on the bus, train or metro.

My other theory on the French Paradox is the love of food that people have here.

People still like to shop like in the old days, buying their bread at the boulangerie (baker), their produce at the fruit shop or the market, their meat at the butcher, and so on.

Food is a big topic of conversation, and don’t be surprised if you get caught in a conversation with a French person where they’ll literally spend half an hour to describe their particular method for picking the best wild mushrooms, or making a particular recipe.

Because of this obsession for food, they also tend to care a lot more about food quality, by buying local products they can trust, and even harvesting and growing produce themselves as much as possible.

Also, the SOCIAL aspect of life is extremely important.

People tend to spend more time together. When they eat, it’s not the same rushed experience you would get at a fast-food restaurant.
Taking two hours to enjoy your lunch with your friends will certainly enhance your digestion, as opposed to angrily and quickly eating a burger alone.
In the end, it’s nothing magical that makes French people slimmer and a bit healthier, in spite of all that fattening food.
It’s a combination of:

  • Reasonable portions
  • Food quality
Social context

Are French People Truly Healthy?

In spite of everything I have said, we should not conclude that French people have found the secret to good life and good health by eating this way.

Cancer rates are still very high — almost as high as they are in North America.

And of course, French traditions are changing, as they are everywhere else.

Here are some final points of advice, translating everything to the raw food world:

* Spend more time to enjoy your meals in good company.
* Don’t eat between meals. (On a raw food diet, that may be a bit difficult to follow).
* Make your meals look beautiful, in order to enhance the appreciation of the whole experience, and even improve digestion.
* Care about what you eat. Discover new foods.
* Grow your own food if you can, or buy from local farmers that you know personally.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
July 4

A must-watch video on fasting

Filed under Fasting & Cleansing by Frederic Patenaude

Dr. Alan Goldhamer and Dr. John McDougall are two doctors and experts in plant-based nutrition that I have a lot of respect for. They’ve both been teaching the virtues of plant-based eating for optimal health and healing since the 70’s and 80’s.

Over the years, thousands of people have dramatically changed their health for the better under the simple principles these two doctors espouse.

Today, the discussion is on water-only fasting and how it affects your health.

Check out the video and you’ll learn:

  • How fasting, or complete and total rest and relaxation, can completely transform a person’s health
  • What care has to be taken when going into a fast
  • How learning to eat immediately after and following the fast is at least as important as the fast itself
  • The reason why some foods act just like drugs in some people
  • Why the key to good health isn’t anything revolutionary or even all that new

Fasting isn’t something that I would recommend to absolutely everyone. The proper considerations, monitoring, and professional aid all need to be in place. But the one thing more powerful than a fast is eating a good diet so you don’t have to fast in the first place!

NOTE: My new book Raw Freedom is STILL on sale this weekend only at 50% off.

Use coupon code: JULYFREEDOM

Note: This book is NOT for everybody. It’s only for people who want to find a healthy balanced between raw and cooked foods. It’s not about a 100% raw diet.

That’s why the sub-title is:

Combining the Best of Raw With Healthy Cooked Foods for the Ultimate Diet

Get it at:

Use coupon code: JULYFREEDOM to get 50% off.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Over the years, I’ve evolved from a very idealistic, somewhat naive view of raw food nutrition, based on the radical energy of my early twenties, to a more mature and complete understanding of the whole picture today.

The problem is that most people starting out on the raw food diet are still hanging on to misinformation, and receive bad advice from raw food authors that is not based in science, but rather in what I call “raw food lore.”

In the end, the raw food diet may very well provide great benefits, but not for the reasons raw foodists claim. Let’s review the most glaring pieces of misinformation that are common in raw food circles and that make this diet the laughingstock of the scientific community.

Remember, the fact that all these “facts” are completely false does not undermine the actual benefits of the diet. Rather, it can mislead raw foodists into making choices that are less than excellent. It also undermines the credibility of the movement, which is often seen as more of a circus of clowns than a true health movement.

#1: “Cooking destroys digestive enzymes.”

By far the biggest raw food myth is that of digestive enzymes. I remember when I first got into raw foods, I was told that cooking anything above 115 degrees Fahrenheit destroyed those living enzymes, and that’s why we get sick. I believed it, even though there wasn’t a shred of true science behind it.

The reality is that although plant enzymes exist, they are made for the survival of the plant itself. For example, enzymes in bananas transform the starch in a green banana into sugar as it ripens. Those enzymes are not necessary for humans, as we produce our own enzymes to digest food.

Even if you could somehow prove that food enzymes are beneficial when isolated, those same enzymes in foods are denatured and deactivated as soon as they reach our stomach. They can’t resist the high acidity of the human stomach.

It’s also false to believe that the human body has a limited supply of enzymes that “runs out” as it gets older. This ludicrous idea was propagated by the mysterious “doctor” Howell, who wrote a famous book on enzymes, which, by the way, has no real scientific references to support any of its claims.

Enzymes are also not alive. They are just proteins that catalyze chemical reactions which could not take place without their presence. Enzymes can only work under very specific conditions, such as the right temperature, pH, and the presence of other co-enzymes. Plant enzymes themselves will only work under a different set of parameters than our own digestive enzymes, which ultimately renders them useless after we eat them.

#2: “Fruits and vegetables are the human-specific diet”

The raw food diet is often promoted based on the idea that humans once lived on a pure raw food diet in perfect health, and as they discovered cooking, and eventually agriculture, their health began to deteriorate, culminating in the current state of bad health people experience today.

Every single discovery in the study of human evolution disproves this fantasy.

First of all, there is credible evidence that humans have been cooking for a very long time. A recent discovery2 showed that the extinct early hominid species homo erectus was cooking food, which would place cooking as beginning over 1.9 million years ago.
It’s true that homo erectus did not evolve into homo sapiens, but is an extinct cousin family. However, the research shows that cooking is much more ancient than we originally believed.

Researcher Professor Richard Wrangham argues in his book Catching Fire that cooking food enabled humans to evolve. Why?

Because it enabled us to get more calories and not spend 60-75% of our time looking for food and chewing it, like other apes.

Our digestive system even adapted to this change by becoming shorter, allowing for much quicker digestion than in other apes and removing the ability to extract much nutrition from insoluble fiber, much of which is already broken down by cooking.

Cooking gave humans an unmatched advantage by making available calorie denser storable foods that could not be consumed otherwise (like tubers), thus allowing for year-round food in a single place.

Modern raw foodists also eat a diet that is nowhere close to that of other apes. We do our own version of cooking and processing with blenders, dehydrators, and other modern appliances, making fibrous vegetables, and even fruit, easier to digest.

#3: “Humans are the only species who cook their food and the only species who suffer from degenerative diseases!”

I never fully believed the myth that wild animals don’t suffer from disease, but it is still a commonly seen argument for a raw food diet.

Wild animals do suffer from a wide range of diseases, but typically some of these could be avoided in the context of modern medicine. In other words, deaths by parasites and infectious disease are common.

Generally, it is true that wild animals don’t suffer from common degenerative diseases that affect humans, such as heart disease.

However, wild animals do die of various kinds of cancer, even if they don’t live in polluted areas.

The problem with this argument is that although it contains a grain of truth, it leads one to believe that a raw food diet is the only way to perfect health. Raw foodists do die from diseases, and in some cases those diseases have nothing to do with their diet (or could not be improved through dietary changes alone). Raw foodists have a lifespan that is quite average in general. This is not something that has been scientifically proven, but a personal observation of mine. If most raw foodists reached a very advanced age, I would have heard about it by now.

I would avoid the “wild animals” argument, because humans are so different from wild animals in so many ways that we can’t possibly compare ourselves to them anyway.

Wild animals don’t wear clothes… Should we try not to either?

#4: “Cooking food turns it into poison.”

Cooking food does affect it at the molecular level. In some cases, raw foods that contain real poisons are rendered edible by cooking. For example, raw kidney beans are poisonous, but by soaking and cooking them we destroy the enzyme inhibitors that can cause serious food poisoning if those beans are eaten raw.

On the other hand, cook some steak over the grill, and you’ll create a series of new, carcinogenic compounds that were not present in the steak before, and we saw a few pages ago that acrylamide, produced by high-heat cooking of carbohydrates, is carcinogenic.

Certain methods of cooking, such as steaming, appear rather innocuous. Of course, raw foodists will say that we don’t know yet what possible toxic compounds are created in any form of cooking, so steamed broccoli could be just as bad as barbecued meat, just for different reasons. This is, of course, pure conjecture, and most likely not true.

If cooked food were truly toxic, the human race would have disappeared a long time ago. This argument doesn’t do a lot of good for the credibility of the raw food movement.

#5: “Cooking destroys the natural live energy in food.”

Some raw foodists have used the “vital energy” argument to promote a raw food diet. The idea is that raw foods contain some kind of vital force that is destroyed by cooking.

To prove their point, they will show you Kirlian photographs (a special type of photography that captures a sort of “aura” around an object), showing the difference between raw and cooked foods. Raw foods appear bright with a beautiful aura, while the aura of the same foods when cooked appears dead, with depressing colors.

Kirlian photography uses a high-voltage source connected to a photographic plate. The object being photographed will be in contact with the plate. Because low current electricity is used, the technique is harmless.

According to Media College:
Small coronal discharges are created by the strong electric field at the edges of the object. The frequency of the electricity excites electrons in the object so they ionize the surrounding air.
Objects must be conductive for this technique to work. The object can be moist (e.g. a living thing), or conduct metal. A dry non-conducting object will not produce the effect. (…)

Many paranormal enthusiasts still claim that the aura captured by Kirlian photography is some sort of “life force.”
However this is easily debunked:

#1: Kirlian photographs can be taken of anything moist or conductive, including coins, paperclips, etc.
#2: Kirlian photographs taken in a vacuum (where no ionized gas is present) show no aura.
#3: Some people claim that a living object slowly loses its aura after it dies. This is more easily explained by the fact that it loses its moisture.

Because raw foods have a high moisture content, they appear more vibrant under Kirlian photography than their cooked counterparts.

#6: “Raw foods are easier to digest than cooked foods.”

It is true that some raw foods are much easier to digest than some cooked foods, but in most cases this is not true.
One example: starchy foods are easier to digest cooked than raw. This category includes potatoes, rice, and pretty much all grains. No population could ever survive eating these foods raw, as we only digest a tiny percentage of the raw starch, compared to most of the cooked starch. Raw starch probably won’t harm you, but you just can’t digest much of it.

Most of the world’s population lives on a starch-based diet, because it is simply a more reliable source of calories.
When raw foodists try to take some grains or beans and eat them raw, I always laugh. I’ve seen recipes that called for soaking rice to “sprout” it, and then turning it into a dish. But raw rice, even when soaked and sprouted, has very little nutritional value, because we don’t digest most of what’s in it. At least raw rice is not toxic, unlike many kinds of beans that can put you in the hospital if you eat them raw (such as kidney beans).

Does that mean I don’t support a raw food diet? Absolutely not! I just think we need to remove the false science from it in order to avoid making big mistakes and taking it to an extreme. 

I expand on this in my new book Raw Freedom. Read it at 50% off using coupon code JULYFREEDOM.

June 2

Let’s say that you were to travel extensively, go on a round-the-world trip, or even just go for a vacation abroad.

Does it make sense to eat a raw food diet when you travel?

As you know, I promote a plant-based diet (raw foods is great), and I am a proponent of eating a lot of fruit.

I’ve also traveled extensively before, including an 8-month trip around the world covering over 20 countries, so I’m aware of the challenges and also advantages of eating raw on the road.

One of my main concerns when traveling is health, which means eating as well as possible and getting exercise (which is not always easy when traveling!).

Overall, I would say that it’s quite easy to eat a plant-based diet when traveling.

The best places to find fruits and vegetables around the world are usually grocery stores and farmer’s markets (which in many countries are just called “markets”).

The problem when traveling is not just to find food, but to have a way to eat it.

At home, I normally use a big Vita-Mix blender at least once a day to make green smoothies.

While traveling, you’ll need to minimize your luggage and bringing a 15-pound vita-mix is usually out of the question. Even a travel blender takes a lot of space and is hardly usable to make smoothies.

A good idea is to bring a flexible cutting board though, as well as one knife and a couple of tupperware containers.

While traveling, a good portion of our diet can consist of fruits that will be cut up and eaten that way.

In many countries like Thailand and even throughout Europe, fruit is easy to find and delicious.

Vegetables are something to watch out for in many foreign countries where the water quality is questionable. I’ve known more than one raw-foodist who got seriously ill with parasites after eating greens and vegetables in Asia.

Also, making a big salad in a hotel room is not that easy or fun to do. So

So I generally eat a lot less salads during my travels and instead eat more cooked vegetables.

Eating 100% Raw or Not?

Some people, for various reasons, make the 100% raw diet the most important focus in their lives. So if they went on a one-year trip around the world, they would do everything they can to eat 100% raw all the time.

For me, based on previous experiences, I’ve decided that eating raw is not my main concern when I travel.

There are several reasons for this:

1) When traveling and without access to fruit in bulk, and without a blender, it’s much harder to get enough calories from fruit.

2) I consider high-fat raw meals to be worse for health than low fat cooked vegan meals.

3) My goal is health and not just “raw foods”. I also want to have fun on a trip and not feel stressed by having to eat 100% raw all the time.

4) Because I don’t want to be eating a lot of raw vegetables in many countries for health reasons, supplementing the diet with some high-nutrient-density cooked vegetables is a good idea.

5) When eating 100% raw for a while, the body will violently react to any cooked foods eaten because it has not adapted to eating them in a while. Based on previous experiences, it’s not a good idea to become *that* sensitive on a trip, especially if it takes you to remote locations where finding enough fruit calories might be difficult.

My philosophy for eating while traveling is simple:

- I eat a lot of fruit because it’s easy to find, safe and usually less expensive than everything else.

- Avoid raw vegetables in many countries for health reasons.

- If I have access to a kitchen and will be in one location for a while, I buy ingredients to make simple and healthy plant-based meals.

- If I’m traveling for tourism, I enjoy some of the local cuisine and burn it off by walking over 18,000 steps a day!

- I don’t worry too much about making my diet perfect when traveling.

Stay safe, eat fruit, walk a lot, and enjoy your trip!

What do you think? If you traveled around the world, would you stick to a 100% raw diet? Post your comments below.

NOTE: You can save 55% on my course “How to Travel the World for Free” by using coupon code IRELAND for this week only. Click the link below to find out more and remember to use the coupon code on checkout for the discount!